![]() I'm actually thrilled because very recently I was thinking about buying the NL4 rack. ![]() If your computer can run Discovery at its optimized settings, then you have a perfect, if not superior, Nord Lead emulation. There can be no more arguing anymore that the hardware sounds better. I must say that the overall net quality of VST's is improving, slowly but surely, and they've matched VA's. I'd been reading all these threads about how much it blows, but all of those threads were created prior to version 6. The only quantifiable difference at this point is the physical chassis and controls. It's at the point where you can't say it doesn't sound as good as the hardware anymore. I'm running it at 24/96kHz 2x oversampling and it is blissful. The developer of Discovery is aware of all these facts and he will work on to improve the overall sound.īTW, despite its easy user interface, Nord 2/2X is an incredibly awesome, organic and deep instrument, just skip the majority of the crappy factory presets and read the manual I am blown away by Discovery. Still lack the bite and snappy envelopes, FM mode often crackles and frequency content is also different, also it is hard to compete with the 96kHz D/A of the 2X series. I have both and the similarity is around 60-70% of the Discovery sound to the NL. The Discovery is a great synth in itself, sounds great, has superb features you will not find on any other synths, but do not compare it to a Nord Lead, as they sound only "somewhat similar". but it is still far from the original Nord 2/2X. In fact, it might be my favorite Nord-derivative synth of all time.Indeed, it is much better now. It continues to do its very best thing, and Disco does too with the Discovery, which is a perfect example of its charm and potential as an instrument. To sum up, the Nord, thank God, isn't dead. Of course, while the Discovery is aimed at the savviest of users, Disco has been made as a very user-friendly VSTi, with IM-essentials such as the 'freeze' function, and a wide range of interface controls that are extremely easy to use. By making the Nord more more user-friendly, more versatile and more affordable, Disco has created a fantastic and fairly inexpensive synth, without losing its ability to do anything that the original could. The Nord is tied in so tightly with the rest of the family, and so closely resembles the original Nord (items and functions in common include the HHB, modular PGA and ACB case), that it's hard to see how the Discovery 2 could have been made at all. You'll be pleasantly surprised by the smooth integration of virtually any FM synthesis.ĭisco's Discovery 2 really does bring the best to its predecessor, and even enhances it far beyond it's original form. If you've managed to get your hands on one of these, there's no reason why you can't build a truly multi-layered synth too. You can also compare camera, performance and reviews online to decide which device is best to buy. And while it's true that the Nord's is a little underpowered when it comes to performing homegrown sounds, those who use it to build up ideas don't seem to mind - indeed, it works so well that it's not uncommon to see a user return to the infamous 'N2' cross-modulation patch once they've tired of the instrumental version. POCO X5 Pro vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G comparison based on specs and price. The Nord's architecture was designed for the most demanding work to get done, so it naturally lends itself to a broad range of uses. If you have the right hardware, DSPs are often the best way to work. ![]() 'Is it a DSP or a soft synth?' is a question I've heard many times over the last few years. What is not enjoyable is attempting to convert a guitar signal to digital and then turn that into an instrument. Plus, playing microtonally is always an enjoyable activity. Disco DSP Discovery Pro Nord Lead 5 4 VSTi NORD RACK EDITION
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |